Opponents of parking reform are often worried that relaxing or removing parking mandates will lead to curbside congestion and inconvenience nearby residents and businesses. Fortunately, there are proven strategies to keep that from happening, and cities can get well ahead of the issue.
The changes don’t happen overnight
Your city will be in exactly the same place the day after your parking reforms go into effect. The curbside parking and parking lots, the shopping centers, and the housing with dedicated parking will still be there. Reforming parking mandates doesn’t make parking evaporate or ban new parking. People with parking at their homes will still be able to drive to all the places they do today.
New development takes time. In any given year, a small percentage of even a fast-growing city is built or redeveloped. In cities with reforms, most of the new buildings still have parking, and a small fraction of the new buildings and businesses — likely the ones built in the places most accessible by transit and biking — will have little or no new parking. In many cases, these buildings and businesses will use nearby parking, but some will be easier to access by people who aren’t driving — and that’s good!
Cities issue permits for all new buildings, and if a lot of development with not much parking is in the pipeline for a community, steps can be taken in advance to manage the situation.
The city should have an answer
There are proven and effective ways to mitigate the impacts of new development on parking. The city needs to be prepared and have a plan when concerns and questions arise.
- Does the city know how much of the existing parking (on-street and off-street) is utilized?
- Does city law allow for flexible and efficient use of existing parking?
- Does the city have permit and meter programs ready to implement when a parking crunch is on the horizon?
- Does the city have a plan to improve transit, sidewalks, and access for other modes?
If the answer to these questions is “no” or “we don’t know,” then it’s a good idea to set the wheels in motion as soon as possible to get to “yes.”
Don’t reinvent the wheel, but don’t copy and paste either
A proactive city will direct city staff to review its existing policies and invest in curb management solutions. Parking mandate reforms are increasingly paired with studies or expansion of existing permit and meter programs.
- Anchorage, AK, approved $1M to study pedestrian safety, right-of-way management, snow removal, and on-street parking management just before they eliminated parking mandates citywide.
- Nashville, TN, expanded the NDOT authority to enforce and manage metered parking, and directed its staff to improve the residential permit program as part of their reforms.
Here are a few resources to help your city prepare:
- A Parking Management Toolkit, developed in Portland, OR, to manage parking spillover from new developments.
- A guide to building public support for parking meter (and potentially permit) districts by spending revenues locally to provide a public benefit. These are commonly called Parking Benefit Districts.
- A technical guide for cities on curb management from Open Plans.
You don’t need to have it all figured out, but you do need to have a plan
Ultimately people want to feel that the city hears their concerns. Eliminating parking mandates isn’t a radical policy, and thousands of U.S. cities have reduced mandates or gotten rid of them in central districts or on corridors. Simply acknowledging the potential for curb congestion and directing staff to develop policies or programs can go a long way.
- Fund a study to develop a residential permit program that is designed to manage parking demand from new developments.
- Create a database of leasable parking in areas with new buildings to help residents find off-site parking if they need it.
- Legalize flexible use of existing commercial and residential parking so it can be used more efficiently.
- Update policies on enforcement and loading and drop zones.
- Monitor new developments and parking occupancy and set trigger points for evaluating if more comprehensive management is needed.
Proceed with confidence
Parking is expensive and takes up a lot of space. Existing parking mandates are arbitrary and hard to justify. You’re doing the right thing by advocating for reforms. The sky will not fall.
Any problems that arise are very likely to be local and solvable with sensible solutions. These solutions can actually make parking more convenient for drivers, and they can raise revenue to improve sidewalks, lighting, and other things residents want.
Good luck! If you get stuck, the Parking Reform Network is here to help.
Pingback: Tony Jordan: Proven strategies to overcome parking reform anxiety - The Progress Playbook
I’ve been looking for any article or threads on parking min abolishment that failed and/or had problems. Do you have any examples of these. All I have found are the many success stories.
Many of the reforms are relatively new. The problems associated with parking reforms are mostly spillover parking issues that aren’t dealt with by the city. Portland, OR removed mandates on corridors in 2002 and then after a building boom with no parking in 2011-12 they reimposed some mandates from 2013-2017, due to neighborhood backlash. Impacts are localized, because removing mandates doesn’t actually change the current situation on the ground.